EXAMPLE / Agents
Draft freely. Send with approval.
Follow one contract boundary through a workflow and an in-memory MCP transport.
Follow the pattern. Inspect its limits.
Explore the source walkthrough, its evidence and the choices you would make in your own application.
Separate the two operations
The source defines draftAndSend.draftMessage and draftAndSend.sendMessage. Drafting is automation-safe; sending declares its approval requirement.
An exploration of the inspected source; no example is executed here.
The situation.
A reference agent drafts a message, waits for approval, and invokes sendMessage. The MCP smoke test uses a real MCP server and client over an in-memory transport. The actual handlers remain deterministic fixture logic.
What you will learn
- Separate an automation-safe draft from an approval-required action.
- Expose an existing operation registry through MCP.
- Check valid, absent, and tampered receipt cases without a live messaging provider.
Follow the operation.
- 01
Separate the two operations
The source defines draftAndSend.draftMessage and draftAndSend.sendMessage. Drafting is automation-safe; sending declares its approval requirement.
- 02
Inspect the workflow
The example connects draft, approval wait, send, and receipt stages through the WorkflowDevkit adapter. This is a composed reference flow, not an invitation feature in the minimal starter.
- 03
Inspect the MCP boundary
The smoke test registers the operation registry as MCP tools, then calls sendMessage with valid, absent, and tampered receipt evidence. It expects success only for the valid case.
- 04
Read what send actually does
The bound handler derives a message ID and returns status sent in memory. To send through a real provider, supply your own port and preserve the same execution boundary.
What the source demonstrates.
- The source smoke fixture drives a real MCP server/client over linked in-memory transports.
- The fixture asserts APPROVAL_REQUIRED for missing and tampered receipts.
- The same registry gate is used by the MCP adapter rather than a second hand-written approval path.
What it does not establish.
- Delivery of a Slack message, email, invitation, or other network request.
- A fresh successful run or production human approval system.
- That the minimal example includes MCP; this is a separate source package.
Bring it into your environment.
Use the exact source context and prerequisites below. A source walkthrough is not a verified public-package installation recipe.
- Access to the inspected source repository and a checkout at the cited revision.
- The repository's Bun workspace dependencies and required generated package exports. These instructions were inspected; the examples were not executed in this review.
Répertoire de travail : examples/draft-and-send-agent
bun test src/mcp-smoke.test.ts src/draft-and-send.workflow.test.tsThe source fixtures inspect workflow sequencing and successful versus denied MCP calls with deterministic handlers.
Test and handler source inspected; not executed here.
Read the related guide →Make the pattern your own.
- Bind the side-effecting operation to your own provider port.
- Issue approval evidence through a trusted application flow.
- Test changed input, absent evidence, and rejected evidence before real delivery.
Inspect the evidence.
Reviewed 2026-10-27 · b67c376f
Pinned source links require repository access; publication and anonymous package availability were not checked for this example.
- Declared maturity
- beta in package manifest
- Catalogue registration
- Source package exists; absent from inspected generated registry
- Inline preview
- Not registered
- Execution in this review
- Not rerun
- Production qualification
- Not assessed